Foster-Parent Advocacy Groups Sue the State in Federal Court, Seeking More Money for Parents Caring for Abused and Neglected Foster Children

The cost of kenneling a dog now exceeds what licensed foster families are paid each month to house, clothe, feed, and care for foster children.

SAN FRANCISCO (October 3, 2007) – State-licensed foster parents in California, many of whom receive less assistance per month from the State than the average cost of kenneling a dog, filed suit today in federal district court, challenging the lawfulness of these low payments under federal law.

The California State Foster Parent Association, Legal Advocates for Permanent Parenting, California State Care Providers Association and the Children’s Advocacy Institute (serving as counsel, with the pro bono assistance of Morrison & Foerster LLP) filed the suit, asserting that assistance rates set by the California Legislature have failed to keep pace with the California Necessities Index (CNI), a component of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) that has risen 25 percent since 2001. In 2008, the average assistance per child paid to licensed foster parents will be about $530 a month.

Citing a recent study from the California Budget Project, a non-partisan and nonprofit fiscal reform group, the suit maintains that an average monthly payment of $709 is required for the State to be in compliance with federal law. A joint report released today by the University of Maryland School of Social Work and the National Foster Parent Association sets the minimum average rate for adequate care in California even higher — at $777.

The federal law requires that licensed foster parents be paid enough to cover the actual cost of providing food, clothing, shelter, daily supervision, school supplies and daily incidentals. According to the lawsuit, California foster-care payments currently cover only a fraction of these costs, resulting in a steep and steady decline in recent years in the number of Californians willing to become foster parents.

Some counties – for example, Sacramento and San Bernardino – have seen the number of willing foster families drop by more than 50 percent. Perversely, this costs the State money, the lawsuit says, because a shortage of foster parents means that abused and neglected children are placed in far more expensive group homes.

Tight state purse strings also tend to make it more difficult to keep foster siblings together in a family or in families that live near one another.

“The data is horrifying, given our moral obligation to these abused and neglected children,” says Edward Howard, senior counsel for Children’s Advocacy Institute. “Forty percent of all of California’s homeless are former foster youth, a terrible indictment of our foster care system. Foster children can also experience post-traumatic stress disorder at rates worse than that of Vietnam veterans.”

The lawsuit comes on the heels of the defeat earlier this year of Assembly Bill 324, introduced by Assembly Member Jim Beall. In addition to a 5% increase (about $25 a month) in payments to families, the measure would have tied future family support increases to upticks in the California Necessities Index, and established a program to educate and train foster parents.

To view the complaint, please click here. For more information, contact CAI Senior Counsel Ed Howard at (916) 844-5646 or eh4@sbcglobal.net.

 
 
     
 
© 2006 CAI
All rights reserved
Children's Advocacy Institute
University of San Diego School of Law
5998 Alcalá Park, San Diego, CA 92110
Telephone: 619.260.4806
Fax: 619.260.4753